Corrigendum: Single Ir Atoms Anchored on Ordered Mesoporous WO₃ Are Highly Efficient for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with CO under Oxygen-rich Conditions (ChemCatChem, (2021), 13, (1834–1846), 10.1002/cctc.202001784)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum

T2 - Single Ir Atoms Anchored on Ordered Mesoporous WO3 Are Highly Efficient for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with CO under Oxygen-rich Conditions (ChemCatChem, (2021), 13, (1834–1846), 10.1002/cctc.202001784)

AU - Jiang, Ruihuan

AU - Liu, Shaomian

AU - Li, Liang

AU - Ji, Yongjun

AU - Li, Huifang

AU - Guo, Xiangfeng

AU - Jia, Lihua

AU - Zhong, Ziyi

AU - Su, Fabing

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH

PY - 2022/3/22

Y1 - 2022/3/22

N2 - This is a Corrigendum for the article entitled “Single Ir Atoms Anchored on Ordered Mesoporous WO3 Are Highly Efficient for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with CO under Oxygen-rich Conditions ”, published in ChemCatChem 2021, 13, 1834–1846, DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202001784. A recent paper by Jiang et al. in this journal reported on the catalytic activity of Ir and WO3-based catalysts for the NO-CO reaction.[1] Unfortunately, two errors were made in the analysis of the data on the characterization of the samples by IR of CO adsorption. The corrections are listed as follows: 1. The misinterpretation of gas-phase bands in the reported IR spectra The bands at 2107 and 2173 cm−1 in the reported IR spectra, which are supposed to be ascribed to the P- and R-branch of gas-phase CO, were wrongly misinterpreted as CO adsorbed on Ir0 and CO linearly bonded to Irδ+ sites, respectively. In the original article, on page 1843, the description of “The band at 2107 cm−1 is due to CO species adsorbed on iridium (Ir0-CO), while that at 2173 cm−1 can be assigned to CO linearly bonded to Irδ+ sites.[44,45]” should be corrected to “The bands at 2107 and 2173 cm−1 can be assigned to P-branch band and R-branch band of gas-phase CO, respectively.[44]” The deletion of reference 45 is because it does not emphasize the interpretation of gaseous CO. 2. The presence of metallic Ir clusters on a sample that was supposed to only exhibit Ir singles atoms On the sample that consisted of ordered mesoporous WO3 supported with single Ir atoms, there also exists a small amount of metallic Ir clusters, which was proved by the appearance of a weak band at 2056 cm−1 in the reported IR spectra referring to the previous references.[2,3] In the original article, the descriptions of “single Ir atoms” should be corrected to “highly dispersed Ir”. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge Professor Frederic Meunier for pointing out our mistakes in interpreting in-situ infrared spectra analysis of CO adsorption. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions. 1. The misinterpretation of gas-phase bands in the reported IR spectra The bands at 2107 and 2173 cm−1 in the reported IR spectra, which are supposed to be ascribed to the P- and R-branch of gas-phase CO, were wrongly misinterpreted as CO adsorbed on Ir0 and CO linearly bonded to Irδ+ sites, respectively. In the original article, on page 1843, the description of “The band at 2107 cm−1 is due to CO species adsorbed on iridium (Ir0-CO), while that at 2173 cm−1 can be assigned to CO linearly bonded to Irδ+ sites.[44,45]” should be corrected to “The bands at 2107 and 2173 cm−1 can be assigned to P-branch band and R-branch band of gas-phase CO, respectively.[44]” The deletion of reference 45 is because it does not emphasize the interpretation of gaseous CO. 2. The presence of metallic Ir clusters on a sample that was supposed to only exhibit Ir singles atoms On the sample that consisted of ordered mesoporous WO3 supported with single Ir atoms, there also exists a small amount of metallic Ir clusters, which was proved by the appearance of a weak band at 2056 cm−1 in the reported IR spectra referring to the previous references.[2,3] In the original article, the descriptions of “single Ir atoms” should be corrected to “highly dispersed Ir”. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge Professor Frederic Meunier for pointing out our mistakes in interpreting in-situ infrared spectra analysis of CO adsorption. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

AB - This is a Corrigendum for the article entitled “Single Ir Atoms Anchored on Ordered Mesoporous WO3 Are Highly Efficient for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with CO under Oxygen-rich Conditions ”, published in ChemCatChem 2021, 13, 1834–1846, DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202001784. A recent paper by Jiang et al. in this journal reported on the catalytic activity of Ir and WO3-based catalysts for the NO-CO reaction.[1] Unfortunately, two errors were made in the analysis of the data on the characterization of the samples by IR of CO adsorption. The corrections are listed as follows: 1. The misinterpretation of gas-phase bands in the reported IR spectra The bands at 2107 and 2173 cm−1 in the reported IR spectra, which are supposed to be ascribed to the P- and R-branch of gas-phase CO, were wrongly misinterpreted as CO adsorbed on Ir0 and CO linearly bonded to Irδ+ sites, respectively. In the original article, on page 1843, the description of “The band at 2107 cm−1 is due to CO species adsorbed on iridium (Ir0-CO), while that at 2173 cm−1 can be assigned to CO linearly bonded to Irδ+ sites.[44,45]” should be corrected to “The bands at 2107 and 2173 cm−1 can be assigned to P-branch band and R-branch band of gas-phase CO, respectively.[44]” The deletion of reference 45 is because it does not emphasize the interpretation of gaseous CO. 2. The presence of metallic Ir clusters on a sample that was supposed to only exhibit Ir singles atoms On the sample that consisted of ordered mesoporous WO3 supported with single Ir atoms, there also exists a small amount of metallic Ir clusters, which was proved by the appearance of a weak band at 2056 cm−1 in the reported IR spectra referring to the previous references.[2,3] In the original article, the descriptions of “single Ir atoms” should be corrected to “highly dispersed Ir”. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge Professor Frederic Meunier for pointing out our mistakes in interpreting in-situ infrared spectra analysis of CO adsorption. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions. 1. The misinterpretation of gas-phase bands in the reported IR spectra The bands at 2107 and 2173 cm−1 in the reported IR spectra, which are supposed to be ascribed to the P- and R-branch of gas-phase CO, were wrongly misinterpreted as CO adsorbed on Ir0 and CO linearly bonded to Irδ+ sites, respectively. In the original article, on page 1843, the description of “The band at 2107 cm−1 is due to CO species adsorbed on iridium (Ir0-CO), while that at 2173 cm−1 can be assigned to CO linearly bonded to Irδ+ sites.[44,45]” should be corrected to “The bands at 2107 and 2173 cm−1 can be assigned to P-branch band and R-branch band of gas-phase CO, respectively.[44]” The deletion of reference 45 is because it does not emphasize the interpretation of gaseous CO. 2. The presence of metallic Ir clusters on a sample that was supposed to only exhibit Ir singles atoms On the sample that consisted of ordered mesoporous WO3 supported with single Ir atoms, there also exists a small amount of metallic Ir clusters, which was proved by the appearance of a weak band at 2056 cm−1 in the reported IR spectra referring to the previous references.[2,3] In the original article, the descriptions of “single Ir atoms” should be corrected to “highly dispersed Ir”. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge Professor Frederic Meunier for pointing out our mistakes in interpreting in-situ infrared spectra analysis of CO adsorption. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124745610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cctc.202101774

DO - 10.1002/cctc.202101774

M3 - 评论/辩论

AN - SCOPUS:85124745610

SN - 1867-3880

VL - 14

JO - ChemCatChem

JF - ChemCatChem

IS - 6

M1 - e202101774

ER -